Featured Post

Lying, What is it Really?

Growing up in a home where honesty was a fluid concept, as a born again Christian, I see the damaging results. Too often, lying is masked as...

Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts

Here's My One Political Post

Satanic influences abound and here is an example with Kamala Harris. Absolutely unbelievable. I do not think anyone who is actually in Christ as a born-again believer can vote Democrat. It is a deceived person who does; meaning, they are outside of a saving relationship with Christ. I don't go around saying this because hearts aren't changed by pounding on the outside of the man, but here on my blog where I can say what I think to those who choose to read what is written, I'm saying it. 

https://notthebee.com/article/someone-shouted-jesus-is-lord-at-a-kamala-rally-and-kamala-responded-that-he-was-at-the-wrong-rally

We need to be in prayer for those who hate truth, hate God, and are heading to an eternity in Hell. God help us love those people. 




States Where Life is Protected

It is still surreal that Roe v. Wade has been overturned. For so many years, most of my life really, this was a desire and often a prayer. In my 10th grade Biology class I argued for why abortion was wrong for a debate topic. 

Now here we are with states being able to have their own laws!! Let us not be complacent; it is still something to thank God for! May He bless the states that are banning abortion and prosper them spiritually and fiscally.

Here is a current map showing the status: 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html

One day I want to live in a state that does not allow the murder of babies. I want my taxes going to a state that has taken a stand for life, and that's where I want to be a blessing to a community. Let the states that kill the innocent sleep in the bed they are making.


a birthday crepe 




Updated COVID Guidelines, from Trustworthy CDC (insert eye roll)

In a shocking turn of events, 2.5 yrs into the 'pandemic' where the recovery rate is still extremely high, the CDC has realized people can use their own risk assessment judgment on how to conduct themselves regarding the novel virus.  Does this mean people may stop telling others they might get a cold after being around them and that they no longer should socially distance or quarantine?

The word 'fatigue' was even mentioned in the article, and not in regard to symptoms, to the useless regulations that have destroyed lives, economies, damaged relationships and revealed how untrustworthy the US media and medical advisors are. Of course, the liberal news source didn't come out and say it quite like this writer did. I'm cutting through the masked refuse.

The main thing COVID has shown is how idiotic the world is, at large and individually. 

Nothing has changed for this writer with the aforementioned news, except hope that one day 'home test' will revert to thoughts of home education and nothing else.




This is How Liberals "Tell the Truth"

It is so subtle you'll miss it if you've been duped by these liars. This is how the left 'admits' omicron was nothing more than a cold, masks don't stop the transmission of covid, and covid is not a serious threat to the vast majority of people, especially children. YET, we still see ignorant people easily controlled by fear and misinformation wearing masks and avoiding congregate settings. Wow.

https://patch.com/virginia/fredericksburg/s/i51h4/cdc-updates-covid-mask-guidelines-what-it-means-in-virginia?utm_source=alert-breakingnews&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=alert




We Need to Remember July 2020

Now that the Democrats are feeling the crush of their lunacy regarding covid vaccines and masking (Biden's 38% approval rating.....), we MUST NOT FORGET what is means to stand for truth. We cannot forget how manipulative and wicked the mainstream media like MSNBC and CNN are. Those who voted for baby-killing Biden should repent and be ashamed of how they bought in to the lies of the left. They should look to their misinformed ways and go in a new direction for their news input. 

Let us not forget the brave people of Grace Community Church who knew worshiping the Lord was tantamount, and that covid was being used to control and fear monger among the nation and the world.

https://baptistnews.com/article/how-john-macarthur-loves-the-bible-but-not-his-neighbor/#.YgvyhYTMKM8

I'll never forget a family member thinking that gathering was worse than abortion, so he voted to expand abortion rights and transgender wickedness among children. That sort of thinking is terribly warped and demonstrates a complete lack of discernment. If we think we are Christians, we must be able to discern evil and we cannot do that if we are not studying the Word of God ourselves and listening to the teaching and preaching of God's word regularly.

https://pulpitandpen.org/2020/07/30/video-dr-macarthur-admits-his-friends-have-forsaken-him/

Be forsaken by those who refuse to stand boldly for Christ. It is worth it.



Without the Media, Would There Be a Pandemic?

One of my friends said the other day that she doesn't think there would be a pandemic without the media, there would be a virus. 

I like a pithy saying laced with good thoughts. I realize, of course, that there are specific criteria to mark something as a pandemic.





Isn't the Media Neutral?

Neutrality is a comfortable place to land. It is easy when we don't feel compelled to pick a side. Look at Sweden. Neutrality has been attributed to that country many times when we simply do not wish to engage in a disagreement or engage our minds enough to search out the truth. But when it comes to news sources, we are fooling ourselves if we think they are neutral. Many issues of our day are not neutral by any stretch, and if we are Christians, we're in dangerous territory if we pretend otherwise. Truly, we are deceived if we claim to live for Christ and yet view the media outlets as neutral. They are anything but. 




As Christians, we are either on the Lord's side or we are not. There are many circumstances in our culture that are either pleasing to God or they are an abomination to Him. Naturally we can conclude that God's people should stand on the side of the line where He is standing. How can we know which side God is on? Read the Bible. Trust it and change our opinions when they do not align with God's. Be in regular fellowship with other believers in church. Submit to the pastoral care and leadership in your church. 




Just as we'd be foolish to form an opinion on someone based solely on the words of their enemies, we are foolish to think we can label ourselves as something and then be that merely because we have a few ideas that seem to put us in that camp. If we claim to be in Christ, we need to check our selves against the Word of God and see if we really are there. 




Realize that the media is driven by an ideology that is not from the Bible. The media is not neutral. There is light and darkness in this world. The media is not ruled by God, they are not the path to truth and what is right. If we're digesting the mainstream media like it is a source of truth, we're in trouble as Christians. There is a spiritual battle being waged in our midst and quite simply, the mainstream media is not on the right side of the battle line.




Why was Rush Limbaugh such an important part of conservativism in America? Because he saw what the liberals and the biased media were doing and would report on it in ways regular folks could understand. The liberals who are anti-freedom hated him for it, but no matter how much they maligned him, they couldn't silence him because to silence him was to silence a LARGE amount of the American populous. There are millions of Americans, just like there were millions of Jews who opposed Hitler, who see what the liberals in this nation are about: control, tyranny, death, fear mongering, oppression and the like. The god of the liberals, including mainstream media, is the government. The God of conservatives is often the One True God, yet not always. How are their irreligious conservatives? Because many people see the tyrannical bent of the liberal media and they want no part of it. They want small government, freedom, and they understand that when the government thinks they are god, the people lose out.  



We must be critical thinkers if we're to stay on the right side of the road. Examine ourselves in light of Scripture--hate what God hates, love what God loves. And to be as shrewd as serpents yet as innocent as doves as the Bible says, we must understand what the wicked influences in this world system are and steer clear of them. 


Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not realize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?—unless indeed you fail to meet the test! 2 Cor 13:5






Safe in the Arms of God

The title of this blog post is the title of a book by Dr. John MacArthur, but I'm using it simply to say that as believers, we are safe, safest even, when we walk circumspectly, as the Lord desires.

Just as an unbeliever can't really claim that everything happens in their life for a good reason, or a reason that will bring some measure of 'positivity', everyone can't claim safety in the Lord. The benefits of being in a saving relationship with God, through Christ, are reserved for born-again Christians. There is not a middle ground. We are either in Christ and safe, or we are outside of Christ and VERY unsafe.

Sinful practices that lead to a lack of safety would be things like having sex outside of marriage or lying when you think it is justified (for example: you don't live in your college district for in-state rates but will say you do so you save money; you call out sick but are not sick; you intentionally mislead people about your actions; you don't claim all of your income on your taxes....). If you get drunk as a part of your life practice, or have other lifestyle sins God expressly prohibits, you can't claim the peace and safety which come from a saving relationship with God. The promises don't apply to people comfortably living in ways that God forbids. God has standards, and they cannot be lowered because someone feels they are the exception. How we live reveals our heart toward sin, and God is clear that those who claim to belong to Him, yet practice these and other sins, are not in Him. Believers represent God, and God has NO place in sin. He uses strong language about hating all who do iniquity. (Ps 5:5)



When Psalm 4:8 says, 'In peace I will both lie down and sleep, For you alone, O Lord, make me to dwell in safety', the believer can know he can safely rest in that truth. It isn't socially distancing that keeps the believer safe, it isn't wearing a mask, it isn't a vaccine, and it certainly isn't staying home for months and months avoiding interaction with one's fellow man to try to stay safe.

Am I staying safe? You betcha. I'm safe because I've trusted God to forgive my sins because of the shed blood of Christ, who died for a wretch like me, was buried and rose from the dead on the 3rd day. As a healthy person WELL under the age for COVID complications, I'm safe in church worshipping the Lord weekly with His people. A Christian who is out of fellowship with the body of Christ is at great risk for being drawn away from the truth. That person is not playing it safe when it comes to their spiritual health. (Christians who are at high risk for serious covid complications need to be proactive in guarding their minds while avoiding society obviously.) I'm safe because my faith is in the God of the Bible, not a man-made religion that thinks we earn the Holy Spirit of God in parts. You can't portion out the three members of the Trinity. 

A saved person attending a Bible preaching church is far safer than the unsaved person who has  quarantined for 10 months. A saved person with COVID is far safer than an unsaved person without COVID. These are dark times spiritually in America. There is a lot of wickedness abounding and more is about to abound with the new administration that is coming. 

Do homage to the Son, that He not become angry, and you perish in the way, For His wrath may soon be kindled. How blessed are all who take refuge in Him! Psalm 2:10


Fetal Cell Lines--What is it All About?

Unfortunately at some point the issue of aborted fetuses comes up with most vaccination discussions. With the covid vaccine being new, there are a few fresh articles discussing this. 

This one from  Nebraska Medicine in Omaha is succinct. 

https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/you-asked-we-answered-do-the-covid-19-vaccines-contain-aborted-fetal-cells

This interview is a bit longer but also worth looking at:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/a-hill-worth-dying-on-expert-explains-how-aborted-baby-cells-taint-covid-vaccines

Understanding more about this:

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/april-web-only/why-christians-refuse-measles-vaccinations-moral-grounds.html

Many in our nation are in healthcare fields that require vaccinations. These are tough issues. It is a personal decision each one of us has to make. Does using fetal lines equate fetal tissue being in the vaccination? Does the good that vaccines do get overlooked because of the tainted process by which the vaccine came into existence or was verified? When our own livelihood isn't impacted, we can more readily denounce any part in aborted fetuses in connection with vaccines. It is important, however, to realize that our fellow citizens may be in a much different predicament. May God have mercy on us as we work through these things. 

I hate that aborted fetuses have ever had any part in medicine. It is deplorable to me. But the fact the babies were not killed for medical reasons should be noted. It may not change a person's view, but is it the same thing to kill a baby for medical investigation vs. using the cells for science after the child was already killed? Maybe, maybe not. Some would say that the good which came from the aborted child is a blessing given the fact the innocent child's life was taken by its mother for her convenience. It is rather like donating your own organs should you die by murder rather than an accident. Does the murder get condoned because your organs have helped someone else live? Of course not. But it would be different to murder someone expressly for their cells and then try to make good out of it. With an innocent, aborted child, of course the best thing would have been for the baby to have had a proper burial, honoring its life and the fact it was created in the image of God. For an adult who is shot in cold blood to have their body for scientific advancements, it somehow seems better. Is it the fact the unborn child had no choice in the matter? What if the murdered adult didn't either? I'm against shooting people in cold blood. I'm also against abortion. But I do want to be consistent in my logic if possible.

This is a sin-wrought world. We should all be concerned with the judgment of God, but just what that looks like, as we've seen with mask compliance,  will vary from person to person. This is simply one argument in the corner of why the federal government should not mandate vaccinations.



Ethical Issues for Christians to Consider

While there are Christians solely focused on spreading the gospel,  we must realize not all believers have the same drive or purpose. The issue of sanctification is important, as well as sharing the truth with the unsaved. One of us plants, another waters and so forth. 

There are serious issues in our culture that Christians cannot ignore simply because their mission is gospel deliverance. I think that we can fall too far into one of two camps: intense political involvement to the point of losing sight of the main thing, or shunning controversial topics like why Christian kids are not well served being in public schools. We want to be black or white so as to avoid confronting ourselves and to not have to make uncomfortable decisions.

Believers under the influence of philosophies contrary to God's word are at greater risk of falling away from the Lord, and then being useless to Him. Children who sit in classrooms devoid of God's truth, are less likely to come to know God, even if they are in church weekly. See the sidebar with Voddie Baucham's "The Children of Caesar" for some compelling data on why this is so. Shouldn't we who know the dangers warn our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ about something they may not know the history of, if God gives that opportunity? We have to care about where kids are educated. The world forces of darkness travel easily in the classrooms of government-funded schools.

The saved also have to care about political issues that God cares about. We live in a country with a system of government that gives us a voice, so we should use it when we can, to be a godly influence. Likewise, we have to understand the purpose of the church--it is for believers primarily, not the lost, and the way church is handled should be primarily for the saved to be edified. Christians who think only about focusing on the gospel often miss the boat on the actual purpose of the church, and the issue of sanctification. God uses other believers as part of the sanctification process, and that happens primarily in church. The pastor's role isn't to primarily reach the lost, it is to edify the saints. Church should be hitting on all of the issues that believers need to be taught and it isn't wrong for sinful cultural practices to be brought up. There is something very wrong in a person's life if they claim to be a Christian yet vote for the unborn to be killed or vote that children should be free to choose their identity, without parental involvement. Likewise, how can Christians think it is OK to have philosophies that are completely contrary to God's word before them for 13 yrs of life? Pastor's are there to shepherd the flock, in all areas. 


These things I have spoken to you so that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the world.

John 16:33

Victoria Cobb, President

Thursday, December 17, 2020

Yesterday, Governor Northam presented his proposed amendments to the 2020-2022 biennial budget to the joint “money committees,” just over a month after he signed a revised budget approved during a special legislative session that lasted 84 days.  In probably a harbinger of what’s to come under a presumptive Biden-Harris administration, we learned that Northam plans to transform the judiciary by setting aside funding to add four judges to Virginia’s Court of Appeals who will be more likely to protect the Left’s radical new policies enacted during his term

Among the other spending measures recommend by the Governor, such as “free” 2-year college for certain students and $90 million to provide vaccines, his signature plan to grow Virginia’s economy and improve education appears to hinge on legalizing recreational marijuana and using tax revenue from the sale of it to fund early childhood education for three and four year-olds.  See the details below.

Education priorities ignore the real needs of families

Among the spending measures Northam outlined yesterday, one of the largest proposals is over $500 million for public schools to supplement the losses in funding due to the reduction in student enrollment.  While he was reluctant to give a full explanation as to why there’s been a drop in enrollment, we know it’s mostly due to parents finding alternative education - private school, PODs, or home schooling – so their child can receive in-person learning or to escape the onslaught of the leftist indoctrination of their kids.  And while the percentage of students failing is increasing in this virtual learning environment, House Minority Leader, Todd Gilbert (R-Woodstock), points out that the Governor’s recommendations offer “no funding to help parents get the technology or other assistance they need to succeed.”

Northam also renewed his call for a program to give three-year-olds access to early childhood education programs, a major priority of his that’s clearly designed to move Virginia towards mandatory universal pre-K education. 

The Governor is proposing $30 million taxpayer dollars to offset financial aid increases at public colleges and universities, and renewed his “free” college program called “Get Skilled. Get a Job. Give Back.” (“G3”).  The G3 plan would make associate degrees at Virginia’s community colleges “free” for students willing to go into certain fields the government deems more valuable than others.  Last year, Del. Mark Cole (R -88, Spotsylvania) likened this same proposal to “indentured servitude for community college tuition,” and believes that while the proposal focuses on the right fields of study, it will be too expensive since “Nothing is free. Somebody somewhere is footing the bill for it.”

Legalizing marijuana to fund early childhood education?

To help pay for all of his early childhood education programs, Governor Northam wants to legalize the recreational use of marijuana, relying on yet another vice like gambling to fund the education of students in Virginia.  Yet, we know that marijuana leads to more addictions, increasingly contributes to automobile infractions, is used by more minors each year, and will further harm families during this pandemic when a record number of people are unemployed.

Aubrey Layne, the Secretary of Finance, also reported yesterday that $90 million of the projected $120 million in tax revenues had been collected through the “temporary” legalization and regulation of [so-called] “games of skill” gambling machines.  Since these games are found in many convenience stores and bars all across Virginia, which have been closed due to mandatory COVID restrictions, there simply wasn’t enough activity to reach their revenue goals. 

It was promised during the regular and special sessions by certain legislators that these “games of skill” would only be made legal through June 2021, so we will be closely monitoring the budget process to see if they will uphold that promise in light of the lower revenue totals admitted during today’s briefing.

Ethical concerns associated with vaccination and LARC proposals

Governor Northam is proposing $90 million to “ensure we have the supplies, staffing, and other infrastructure needed to vaccinate eight million Virginians” with the new COVID vaccine.  Funding to provide vaccines to 8 million Virginians (VA has about 8.5 million total), combined with Northam’s statement that “vaccines are the only way we can end this pandemic and get back to a more normal life,” appear to indicate the real possibility that his administration is preparing for mandated vaccines without religious or ethical exceptions.  This would be a major infringement upon individual liberty, as every person should have the freedom to decide for themselves and their families whether or not to receive the vaccination.

The Governor has also recommended continuing the “LARC” program which essentially funnels $2 million each year to Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics to pay for and insert intrauterine devices (IUDs).

These are just some of the priorities the Governor is hoping to spend your tax dollars on over the next two years, but like any budget we’ll be reviewing the Governor’s proposed amendments for other items such as taxpayer funded abortion.  You can also review his proposed budget amendments yourself HERE.



Interesting Obituary Email I Received

What do you think of this? Do you think it is a reality that is happening here in America? Do you think these facts are accurate?

-----------------------------------------------

In 1787 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the
University of Edinburgh , had this to say about the fall of the
Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior: "A democracy is always
temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent
form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until
the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous
gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority
always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from
the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally
collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a
dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the
beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200
years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage."
The Obituary follows:

Born 1747 died 1813
It doesn't hurt to read this several times.
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in
St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning
the last Presidential election:

Number of States won by:         Obama: 19               Romney: 29
Square miles of land won by:    Obama: 580,000      Romney: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million  Romney: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Obama: 13.2             Romney: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Romney won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low
income tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the
"complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of
democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population
already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase..

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million
criminal invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say
goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.



Protect Homeschooling Freedom--Act Now Please!

Crucial Week to Stop Attack on Faith-Based Homeschooling





Call or email today.







Senior Counsel Scott Woodruff answers questions and assists members with legal issues in your state. He and his wife homeschooled their children.
Read more >>

Dear HSLDA Members and Friends:

This is the crucial week when the House Rules Committee may decide to protect your freedom by voting “no” on HJ 92 or move toward restricting faith-based homeschool families by voting “yes.” The Committee is expected to meet this Friday, January 31.

Lobbyists who want to reduce your freedom have been visiting lawmakers urging them to support HJ 92. Will you help counteract their influence?

We need your voice this week to help fill Richmond with the message that freedom is priority number one, and that HJ 92 should be stopped!

Action Requested


1. Find out who your delegate is! Use this link. If your delegate is on the Rules Committee (see list of members below) please:

2. Pay a personal visit to your delegate before Friday. Explain in your own words why you are opposed to HJ 92, and ask your delegate to vote against it. Delegates pay attention to their constituents! The offices of all delegates are located in the General Assembly Building, 910 Capitol St., Richmond. Here is a link to directions and parking suggestions. Before you go, take a few minutes and familiarize yourself with the issues by reading the background section below and the talking points.

3. If it just won’t work for you to visit your delegate in person, place a phone call to your delegate. The phone numbers are listed below. Your message can be as simple as “I am one of your constituents. Please vote NO on HJ 92. No study is needed of the religious exemption. It has been a cornerstone of religious freedom in Virginia for 37 years.” Or you can make your own message using information in this e-lert.

4. Mark your calendar to come to Richmond on February 4. I plan to visit the office of every committee member that morning. Is your delegate on the committee? If so, it will be incredibly helpful if you, their constituent, come with me. We will go as a group and visit each member of the committee. Together we can multiply our impact! I will send details about time and location later this week. This HLSDA event is independent of but on the same day as the Capitol Day sponsored by Home Educator’s Association of Virginia. The HSLDA event will be canceled if the committee kills HJ 92 on Friday. The HEAV event will go forward regardless.

Contact Information


Steven Landes (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1025
Email: DelSLandes@house.virginia.gov

M. Kirkland Cox (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1066
Email: DelKCox@house.virginia.gov

Terry Kilgore (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1001
Email: DelTKilgore@house.virginia.gov

R. Lee Ware (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1065
Email: DelLWare@house.virginia.gov

S. Chris Jones (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1076
Email: DelCJones@house.virginia.gov

Robert D. Orrock (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1054
Email: DelBOrrock@house.virginia.gov

Barry D. Knight (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1081
Email: DelBKnight@house.virginia.gov

Riley E. Ingram (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1062
Email: DelRIngram@house.virginia.gov

Jimmie Massie (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1072
Email: DelJMassie@house.virginia.gov

Gregory Habeeb (R)
Phone: (804) 698-1008
Email: DelGHabeeb@house.virginia.gov

Johnny S. Joannou (D)
Phone: (804) 698-1079
Email: DelJJoannou@house.virginia.gov

Kenneth R. Plum (D)
Phone: (804) 698-1036
Email: DelKPlum@house.virginia.gov

Algie Howell, Jr. (D)
Phone: (804) 698-1090
Email: DelAHowell@house.virginia.gov

David J. Toscano (D)
Phone: (804) 698-1057
Email: DelDToscano@house.virginia.gov

Background


A study by Dr. Brian Ray showed that students homeschooled under the religious exemption score 33 percentile points higher than others on standardized tests.

The study itself would place an administrative burden on the state Department of Education and local school boards. But the measure provides no funds to cover these additional expenses. It is an unfunded mandate.

No study is necessary. All five of the questions that HJ 92 proposes can be answered without a study.

The first question is how school boards decide if an exemption should be granted. The simple answer is that they follow the clear requirements of the statute.

The second question is whether school boards ever review their decisions. The answer is simple. Laws already on the books would allow a school board to review its decision if there is a good reason to review it.

The third question is whether school boards require an exemption to be renewed. The simple answer is that some do and some don’t.

The fourth question is whether school boards monitor the education of exempted students. The simple answer is no. They are exempt from all government education mandates.

The fifth question is whether the religious exemption statute should be amended to better carry out the state’s duty under the Virginia Constitution to provide free public education and compulsory attendance. This question shows that Del. Rust, who sponsored HJ 92, does not understand the Virginia Constitution.

The simple answer is that the religious exemption statute was never intended to implement the public education-compulsory attendance sections of the Constitution. It was intended to implement a far older, and far more foundational part of the Constitution: Article 1, Section 15, which guarantees the free exercise of religion.

One homeschool graduate recently criticized the religious exemption statute claiming that because it allowed his parents to homeschool him without government mandates, he had to take remedial classes when he enrolled in community college. This complaint does not hold water. Sixty percent of all community college students take at least one remedial or developmental class. And despite the education he got at home, now he attends Georgetown University, one of the nation’s top 25.

Between 1976 when the religious exemption statute was enacted and 1984 when the home instruction statute was enacted, religious exemption was the only way to homeschool legally. It’s not likely, but if the home instruction statute were ever repealed, the religious exemption statute would still allow families to homeschool their children if they believe that enrolling their children in public school is against God’s will for them.

A number of Virginia Amish families stop providing formal education to their children once they finish 8th grade. These families could be in danger of criminal prosecution if the religious exemption statute is threatened. Many other deeply religious families place such an emphasis on separation from the state that they would refuse to file a notice of intent if the religious exemption were not available. They, too, could be in danger of prosecution if the exemption is threatened.

The religious exemption statute works so well and with so little controversy that during its 37 years of operation, it has generated only one lawsuit that has come before the Virginia appellate courts.

Legislative studies are often used to clear the path so more laws can be enacted. It’s obvious that Del. Rust’s real plan is to use the results of the study (if it is conducted) to somehow support him in trying to take away some of your rights in the future.

Our webpage for HJ 92 provides a link to additional talking points about HJ 92.

The Home Educators Association of Virginia, the Organization of Virginia Homeschoolers, and HSLDA are united in opposing HJ 92.

Thank you for standing with us for freedom!

Sincerely,

Scott A. Woodruff
HSLDA Senior Counsel

P.S. We greatly value you and your support—it is a privilege to serve you! If you or someone you know is not a member of HSLDA, will you consider taking a moment today to join or recommend us? Your support for our work enables us to defend individual families threatened by government officials and protect homeschooling freedom for all. Join now >>
• • • •


Extreme makeovers are for extreme circumstances...


Most homeschools don’t need an extreme makeover, but there is something to be said for attention to detail and recognition of accomplishments. Watch the media and you’ll soon see that not everyone wants home educators and homeschooling to look good. HSLDA works hard to shed light on the good work of home educators so it’s obvious that we don’t need someone “making-over” our homeschools. Join HSLDA and help us show the world that we’re fine as we are…thank you!

More reasons to join HSLDA >>

Ann Coulter: Democrats Think They Own the Government

DEMOCRATS TO AMERICA: WE OWN THE GOVERNMENT!





Ann Coulter                                 14 hours ago                        





                                        In the current fight over the government shutdown, Republicans are simply representing the views of the American people.

Americans didn't ask for Obamacare, they don't want it, but now their insurance premiums are going through the roof, their doctors aren't accepting it, and their employers are moving them into part-time work -- or firing them -- to avoid the law's mandates.

Contrary to Obama's promises, it turns out: You can't keep your doctor, you can't keep your insurance -- you can't even keep your job. In other words, it's a typical government program, but this one wrecks your health care.

Also, the president did raise taxes on the middle class in defiance of his well-worn campaign promise not to. Indeed, Obamacare is the largest tax hike in U.S. history.

Among the other changes effected by this law are:

-- Obamacare will allow insurers to charge 50 percent higher premiums for smokers, but prohibits insurers from increasing premiums for those with HIV/AIDS.

-- Nationally, Obamacare will increase men's individual insurance premiums by an average of 99 percent and women's by 62 percent. In North Carolina, for example, individual insurance premiums will triple for women and quadruple for men.

-- Health plans valued at $27,500 or more for a family of four will be taxed at a rate of 40 percent.

-- No doctors who went to an American medical school will be accepting Obamacare.

-- A 62-year-old man earning $46,000 a year is entitled to a $7,836 government tax credit to buy health insurance. But if he earns an extra $22 in income, he loses the entire $7,836 credit. He will have more take-home pay by earning $46,000 than if he earns $55,000. (If he's lucky, he already works for one of the companies forced by Obamacare to reduce employees' hours!)

-- Merely to be eligible for millions of dollars in grants from the federal government under Obamacare, education and training programs are required to meet racial, ethnic, gender, linguistic and sexual orientation quotas. That's going to make health care MUCH better!

-- Obamacare is turning America into a part-time nation. According to a recent report by economist John Lott, 97 percent of all jobs added to the economy so far this year have been part-time jobs. Ninety-seven percent!

-- Obamacare is such a disaster that the people who wrote it refuse to live under it themselves. That's right, Congress won a waiver from Obamacare.

Responding to the people's will, House Republicans first voted to fund all of government -- except Obamacare. Obama refused to negotiate and Senate Democrats refused to pass it.

Then the Republicans voted to fully fund the government, but merely delay the implementation of Obamacare for one year. Obama refused to negotiate and Senate Democrats refused to pass it.

Finally, the Republicans voted to fully fund the government, but added a requirement that everyone live under Obamacare. No more special waivers for Congress and their staff, and no waivers for big business without the same waivers for individuals.

Obama refused to negotiate and Senate Democrats refused to pass it. So as you can see, Republicans are the big holdup here.

A longtime Democratic operative, Karen Finney, explained the Democrats' intransigence on MSNBC to a delighted Joan Walsh (aka the most easily fooled person on TV) by comparing House Republicans to a teenager trying to borrow his mother's car. "No, I'm not negotiating!" Mother says. "It's MY CAR!"

This wasn't a stupid slip of the tongue that other Democrats quickly rejected. Finney had used the exact same metaphor to a panel of highly agreeable MSNBC guests the day before. (MSNBC books no other kind of guest.)

The left thinks the government is their car and the people's representatives are obstreperous teenagers trying to borrow the government. Which belongs to Democrats.

That's not how the Constitution views the House of Representatives. To the contrary, the House is considered most reflective of the people's will because its members are elected every two years.

As a matter of fact, the Republicans who mistakenly assume they have something to do with running the government represent most of the people who pay taxes to run it. So it's more like a teenager who is making the car payments, maintaining the car insurance and taking responsibility for registering the car being told: "It's not your car."

But the Democrats refuse to even negotiate. It's their government -- and if you Republicans think you're going out dressed like that, you've got another thing coming! Needless to say, they absolutely will not consider the Republicans' demand that Democrats merely live under Obamacare themselves.

Instead, Democrats say "the Koch brothers" are behind the effort to defund Obamacare.

They say Republicans are trying to "burn the whole house down" (Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz); "have lost their minds" (Sen. Harry Reid); are trying to negotiate "with a bomb strapped to their chest" (senior White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer); are "legislative arsonists" (Rep. Nancy Pelosi); and are engaging in "blatant extortion" (White House press secretary Jay Carney).

The MSNBC crowd calls Republicans "arsonists" every 15 minutes. They ought to check with fellow MSNBC host Al Sharpton. He knows his arsonists! In 1995, Sharpton whipped up a mob outside the Jewish-owned Freddy's Fashion Mart with an anti-Semitic speech. Sometime later, a member of the mob torched the store, killing seven Hispanic employees.

Every single Democrat in the country uses the exact same talking point: We "refuse to negotiate with a gun being held to our head."

Which means that the Democrats will engage in no negotiation at all -- not now, not ever. House Republicans have already passed three-dozen bills defunding, or otherwise modifying, Obamacare. Senate Democrats and liberal commentators had a good laugh at Republicans for passing them. Now they're paying attention!

If you are in the minority of Americans not already unalterably opposed to Obamacare, keep in mind that the only reason the government is shut down right now is that Democrats refuse to fund the government if they are required to live under Obamacare.

That's how good it is!

COPYRIGHT 2013 ANN COULTER

Parental Rights Call to Action!!!

September 17, 2013

 

Call Congress to Action!


 

Please help us call on Congress this week and next to sign on to HJRes. 50, the Parental Rights Amendment.

With conflict in Syria and questions about the new health care law, you may already have a good reason to call Congress on other issues of importance to you. Just this morning Congress cancelled a one-week recess that had been scheduled for next week in order to give themselves time to work on the continuing resolution to fund the government for the next year.

So call them about these other issues – but while you’re at it, urge them to cosponsor the Parental Rights Amendment. (ParentalRights.org has no official position on these other matters.)

Think about it: At a time when every decision requires days or weeks of dealing and debate, this is something they can take care of quickly and easily. Becoming a cosponsor on the Parental Rights Amendment, HJRes50, will only take them a few minutes. Sending a quick message to Rep. Mark Meadows’ office is all they need to do to get on board.

And think what it will say about the importance of parental rights if we can cut through the din of Syria and government funding by sheer call volume on the subject!

Because of your diligent grassroots efforts during August recess each year, September is always a great time of adding cosponsors to the Amendment. But with all the other concerns this year, that hasn’t happened yet. That is another great reason for us to call them now.

This is a limited-time call blitz – today through next Friday only. We are asking you to take a moment now to call your Congressman, then plan to call once more in the next week and a half. Just two phone calls – or a call and an email – urging your representative to take 2 minutes to get something done: become a cosponsor of HJRes. 50, the Parental Rights Amendment.

To find your lawmaker’s contact information, click on your state (or its 2-letter abbreviation for non-flash/mobile users) at ParentalRights.org/States.

Here are a few points you might want to remember when you call:


 

  • The legal standard for protecting parental rights has been left up in the air since the Supreme Court’s Troxel decision in 2000, which notably failed to apply “strict scrutiny” protection.

  • With no clear direction from the Supreme Court, lower federal and state courts are confused on the level of protection parental rights should receive. As a result, parental rights are becoming protected only on a case-by-case basis.

  • The Supreme Court determined in Reid v. Covert (1957) that ratified treaties can override the Tenth Amendment’s reservation of rights to the States if the right in question – in this case, parental rights – is not expressly preserved in the text of the Constitution.

  • Two international treaties threaten the presumption that fit parents act in the best interests of their children, including one – the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – that has been taken up by the Senate as recently as last year. The PRA would protect existing parental rights from threats by treaties like this one.

  • According to a Zogby poll on parental rights, 93% of all Americans support the traditional view that fit parents have the right to make decisions for their children without government interference. That includes 97% of Republican voters and 92% of Democratic voters. This is the very standard the Parental Rights Amendment seeks to preserve.



Thank you for taking the time to call. Together, we can see support for the Amendment grow even in this one-week Congress!

Sincerely,

Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research



Submitting to Government

I was listening to a John MacArthur sermon regarding how a Christian should respond to an ungodly government. He was encouraging us to follow the Word of God and not protest, but live peaceably. It really made me think how different Christians would be viewed if we all viewed those we differ with politically as a mission field, as MacArthur has said according to my husband, rather than the enemy. I wonder if we are winning the 'battles' from time to time, but will ultimately lose the war.

In this age of popularizing a social gospel instead of offending with the saving Gospel, we ought to seriously consider if we are really hurting the overall cause of Christ because of our loud political agendas. Are we most concerned with people's hearts, or with making this nation choose morality? Are we most concerned with saving lives or souls? Do we want unbelievers to think we're relevant and cool or do we want them to see someone not afraid to live biblically?

Jesus didn't tattoo himself or hang out partying so that people would then want to sit and listen at his feet.

Efffects of Obamacare

I doubt anyone who actually pays attention to facts still thinks the Affordable Care Act is going to help people have more health coverage, but just in case, here is a story to help you out.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/15/nation-biggest-movie-theater-chain-cuts-workweek-blaming-obamacare/?intcmp=trending