Religious Exemption Under Attack in Virginia

Action Needed: Loudoun County School Board Lurches Left

Dear Friends, On November 13th, the Loudoun County School Board adopted their legislative agenda for the upcoming General Assembly 2019 session. They took advantage of the resignation of a conservative member, the absence of another conservative member due to a family health emergency, and some sly language to sneak through some policy positions that should concern all of us. Video of the Nov. 13th adoption of this agenda is available here. Here are a few items of concern: Repeal of the "Religious Exemption" - this would force homeschoolers to have their curriculum pre-approved by the public schools! More details are in HSLDA's email alert here. Prohibit currently-legal right to self-defense in certain public buildings. Adopt pro-LGBT special treatment for school employees- this is not needed, and would be detrimental to school safety. It is only being done to move school policies in the direction towards even more outrageous policies in the future. Please email the entire School Board, and call your at-large and district school board members today and ask them to reconsider the legislative program. This action would need to be taken at their meeting tomorrow. You can also speak to the school board during the public comments period of their meeting at 6:30 p.m. on November 27 at 21000 Education Court, Ashburn. As always, feel free to contact me or my staff with any questions or concerns; we are here to serve you! You can reach us at info@voteLaRock.us, 540-751-8364, Facebook, and Twitter Sincerely, Please share this time-sensitive information with others via email, Facebook, Twitter, etc. CONTACT ME! Email: DelDLaRock@house.virginia.gov Richmond Office: (804) 698-1033 District Office: P.O. Box 6 Hamilton, Virginia 20159 (540) 751-8364 Social Media: Facebook: DelegateDaveLaRock Twitter: LaRock4Delegate COMMITTEES Transportation Education Science and Technology COMMISSIONS Joint Commission on Technology and Science Northern Virginia Transportation Commission Joint Commission for Transportation Accountability

So, Guard Yourselves-- Part II

First Baptist of Wheeling, WV has their sermons online, and close to when they are preached which is really nice. I've recently finished listening to "So, Guard Yourselves" based out of Malachi, and it is worthwhile. Staying faithful is an idea becoming more and more antiquated in our self-focused culture. I hope you'll take the time to listen, especially if you are married or will be one day.

So, Guard Yourselves Part 2

Why Not to Use Homemade Laundry 'Detergent"

The Risks of DIY Laundry 'Detergent'/Soap

I'm not sure what the truth is, but the risk of ruining a washer is something to consider. I do think the post would have been a LOT more powerful had the OP left off her sales pitch for her detergent. It really fell apart there...

So, Guard Yourselves: First Baptist of Wheeling (Link Fixed)

This Nov 4th 2018 sermon does a very good job illustrating the importance of guarding our hearts, particularly in the area of marriage, but application is given to young people dating and relationships within the body of Christ. Please listen to it if you are a believer. You will be blessed to hear this message. Sermons at First Baptist of Wheeling "So, Guard Yourselves" Part 1

Ligonier Ministries, Is the Reformation Over?

From R.C. Sproul, Ligonier Ministries 

Nov 2, 2018

Is the Reformation Over?

There have been several observations rendered on this subject by those I would call “erstwhile evangelicals.” One of them wrote, “Luther was right in the sixteenth century, but the question of justification is not an issue now.” A second self-confessed evangelical made a comment in a press conference I attended that “the sixteenth-century Reformation debate over justification by faith alone was a tempest in a teapot.” Still another noted European theologian has argued in print that the doctrine of justification by faith alone is no longer a significant issue in the church. We are faced with a host of people who are defined as Protestants but who have evidently forgotten altogether what it is they are protesting.

Contrary to some of these contemporary assessments of the importance of the doctrine of justification by faith alone, we recall a different perspective by the sixteenth-century magisterial Reformers. Luther made his famous comment that the doctrine of justification by faith alone is the article upon which the church stands or falls. John Calvin added a different metaphor, saying that justification is the hinge upon which everything turns. In the twentieth century, J.I. Packer used a metaphor indicating that justification by faith alone is the “Atlas upon whose shoulder every other doctrine stands.” Later Packer moved away from that strong metaphor and retreated to a much weaker one, saying that justification by faith alone is “the fine print of the gospel.”

The question we have to face in light of these discussions is, what has changed since the sixteenth century? Well, there is good news and there is bad news. The good news is that people have become much more civil and tolerant in theological disputes. We don’t see people being burned at the stake or tortured on the rack over doctrinal differences. We’ve also seen in the past years that the Roman communion has remained solidly steadfast on other key issues of Christian orthodoxy, such as the deity of Christ, His substitutionary atonement, and the inspiration of the Bible, while many Protestant liberals have abandoned these particular doctrines wholesale. We also see that Rome has remained steadfast on critical moral issues such as abortion and ethical relativism. In the nineteenth century at Vatican Council I, Rome referred to Protestants as “heretics and schismatics.” In the twentieth century at Vatican II, Protestants were referred to as “separated brethren.” We see a marked contrast in the tone of the different councils. The bad news, however, is that many doctrines that divided orthodox Protestants from Roman Catholics centuries ago have been declared dogma since the sixteenth century. Virtually all of the significant Mariology decrees have been declared in the last 150 years. The doctrine of papal infallibility, though it de facto functioned long before its formal definition, was nevertheless formally defined and declared de fide (necessary to believe for salvation) in 1870 at Vatican Council I. We also see that in recent years the Roman communion has published a new Catholic catechism, which unequivocally reaffirms the doctrines of the Council of Trent, including Trent’s definition of the doctrine of justification (and thus affirms that council’s anathemas against the Reformation doctrine of justification by faith alone). Along with the reaffirmations of Trent have come a clear reaffirmation of the Roman doctrine of purgatory, indulgences, and the treasury of merits.

At a discussion among leading theologians over the issue of the continued relevance of the doctrine of justification by faith alone, Michael Horton asked the question: “What is it in the last decades that has made the first-century gospel unimportant?” The dispute over justification was not over a technical point of theology that could be consigned to the fringes of the depository of biblical truth. Nor could it be seen simply as a tempest in a teapot. This tempest extended far beyond the tiny volume of a single teacup. The question, “what must I do to be saved?” is still a critical question for any person who is exposed to the wrath of God.

Even more critical than the question is the answer, because the answer touches the very heart of gospel truth. In the final analysis, the Roman Catholic Church affirmed at Trent and continues to affirm now that the basis by which God will declare a person just or unjust is found in one’s “inherent righteousness.” If righteousness does not inhere in the person, that person at worst goes to hell and at best (if any impurities remain in his life) goes to purgatory for a time that may extend to millions of years. In bold contrast to that, the biblical and Protestant view of justification is that the sole grounds of our justification is the righteousness of Christ, which righteousness is imputed to the believer, so that the moment a person has authentic faith in Christ, all that is necessary for salvation becomes theirs by virtue of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness. The fundamental issue is this: is the basis by which I am justified a righteousness that is my own? Or is it a righteousness that is, as Luther said, “an alien righteousness,” a righteousness that is extra nos, apart from us—the righteousness of another, namely, the righteousness of Christ? From the sixteenth century to the present, Rome has always taught that justification is based upon faith, on Christ, and on grace. The difference, however, is that Rome continues to deny that justification is based on Christ alone, received by faith alone, and given by grace alone. The difference between these two positions is the difference between salvation and its opposite. There is no greater issue facing a person who is alienated from a righteous God.

At the moment the Roman Catholic Church condemned the biblical doctrine of justification by faith alone, she denied the gospel and ceased to be a legitimate church, regardless of all the rest of her affirmations of Christian orthodoxy. To embrace her as an authentic church while she continues to repudiate the biblical doctrine of salvation is a fatal attribution. We’re living in a time where theological conflict is considered politically incorrect, but to declare peace when there is no peace is to betray the heart and soul of the gospel.

This post was originally published in Tabletalk magazine.